<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roleplaying Via Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.umbralechoes.com/2009/12/08/roleplaying-via-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.umbralechoes.com/2009/12/08/roleplaying-via-google-wave/</link>
	<description>Ghostly Echoes in the Void</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.umbralechoes.com/2009/12/08/roleplaying-via-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-41702</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.umbralechoes.com/?p=422#comment-41702</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair expectation to have -- that&#039;s what drives innovation.  What&#039;s useful at this point, I think, is to answer the question, &quot;What online tabletop replacement experience do I want, and what does Google (or some robot writer, or someone else with some other product) need to do to deliver that?&quot;

A few things come to mind for me, though a lot of these are dreaming big:

* The ability to change your nickname (and maybe even avatar) in different waves, so that you can post as your character.
* Integrated video chat/conferencing, with automated transcripts.  This would be quite useful for business meetings/presentations/etc. too, but for roleplaying, it would solve a lot of the speed issue, while maintaining the session transcript.
* Better collaborative mapping tools, to replace miniatures for systems like D&amp;D 4e.
* Some sort of character sheet integration.
* More automation in general -- e.g. DM can issue a command to have everyone roll a Spot check, and it happens in one fell swoop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair expectation to have &#8212; that&#8217;s what drives innovation.  What&#8217;s useful at this point, I think, is to answer the question, &#8220;What online tabletop replacement experience do I want, and what does Google (or some robot writer, or someone else with some other product) need to do to deliver that?&#8221;</p>
<p>A few things come to mind for me, though a lot of these are dreaming big:</p>
<p>* The ability to change your nickname (and maybe even avatar) in different waves, so that you can post as your character.<br />
* Integrated video chat/conferencing, with automated transcripts.  This would be quite useful for business meetings/presentations/etc. too, but for roleplaying, it would solve a lot of the speed issue, while maintaining the session transcript.<br />
* Better collaborative mapping tools, to replace miniatures for systems like D&#038;D 4e.<br />
* Some sort of character sheet integration.<br />
* More automation in general &#8212; e.g. DM can issue a command to have everyone roll a Spot check, and it happens in one fell swoop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blog.umbralechoes.com/2009/12/08/roleplaying-via-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-41686</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.umbralechoes.com/?p=422#comment-41686</guid>
		<description>I have the same frustrations. I think my main frustration, though, is that I want the experience to be better than it is, which isn&#039;t an entirely fair expectation to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same frustrations. I think my main frustration, though, is that I want the experience to be better than it is, which isn&#8217;t an entirely fair expectation to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
